You can benefit from the services of the TRANSILVANIA EXPERTISE HOUSE brand, including in the courts and JUDICIAL EXPERTS respectively.
We carry out the following types of judicial expertise with the same professionalism and impartiality.
IMOBILIARY JUDICIAL EXPERTS
TOPOGRAPHIC JUDICIAL EXPERTS
CONTABLE JUDICIAL EXPERTS
FISCAL JUDICIAL EXPERTS
SILVIC Judicial EXPERTS
Our company can also assist the parties in CIVIL or PENAL PROCEDURES for problems and works of high complexity through a WORKING GROUP consisting of EXPERTS and JUDICIAL SPECIALISTS effectively led in order to solve and achieve the designated objectives.
The specialities are presented in the Nomenclature of Specializations of Judicial Technical Expertise, approved by the Order of the Minister of Justice. Currently, Order No. 199/2010, as amended.
Judicial expertise is the kingmentate of Ordinance 2/2000 document that can be consulted and downloaded below:
Loading...
Reload Document 
Open in new tab Law 178/2009 and Law 208/2010 amend and supplement this ordinance as well as OG13.2010.
In accordance with OG no. 24/2011, standards of
evaluation approved by ANEVAR are mandatory for all evaluation activities, including evaluation carried out in the framework of judicial expertise!
The court expert is acquired following a specialized examination and is granted by the Ministry of Justice.
Real estate valuation standards in judicial expertise: – material taken from Value magazine, interview Adrian Vascu President ANEVAR
What were the evaluation standards that were used until the emergence of OG no. 24/2011?
ANEVAR members were required to comply with the evaluation standards. In the area of judicial expertise, however, there was no legal provision for the applicable assessment standards. As we have seen above, because this activity was not based on a specific university specialisation, there was a "legislative vacuum" on the applicable professional rules. This situation was very delicate because, when dealing with assessments of the same asset made at the request of the court (which called the judicial experts), or at the request of the parties (calling an ANEVAR expert, without having the status of judicial expert), the results of the two reports were often different, primarily because they were not based on the same professional rules.
Such a situation led to and maintained a conflict situation and could derisively throw the evaluation work into disrepute as long as two experts estimated the value of the same good, on the same date, for the same purpose, based on the same information, and obtained different results. I believe that this is the greatest danger that can shake the confidence of the public and designated users in the goods assessment services.
What is the link between assessment standards and judicial expertise after the emergence of OG no. 24/2011?
In accordance with Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1 (2) of OG No.24/2011, ANEVAR adopts the mandatory evaluation standards for carrying out the evaluation work. It is common ground that this mandatory rule contributes directly to the achievement of the purpose of OG Regulation No 17. 24/2011, to unify the methodology underlying the estimate of the value of a good in Romania. Therefore, after the entry into force of OG No 1 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Council of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market 24/2011, the evaluation standards adopted by ANEVAR have become mandatory for any evaluation activity, including the work of judicial technical expertise carried out by judicial technical experts.
Thus, as from June 2012 when the provisions of OG No 1 came into force, the provisions of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 December 2002 on the implementation of the Treaty on European Union and the European Union of The European Communities, as last amended by Regulation (EC 24/2011 – all valuations of goods in Romania had to be carried out in accordance with the valuation standards approved by ANEVAR. This information was not known to all parties involved.
Even if not knowing the law is not an excuse, we also consider it a duty of ANEVAR to inform the public involved, this article being also an approach to this.
SOLICITE A PERSONALIZED OFFER NOW
